Review alternative investment allocations from endowments, family offices and investor networks, pensions and sovereign funds, and sponsor and manager research.
Showing 51 of 51
Alaska Permanent Fund
U.S. sovereign permanent fund
As of June 30, 2025 · Actual holding
Public Equities
33%
Fixed Income
20%
Private Equity
17%
Real Estate
11%
Private Income
9%
Absolute Return
7%
Tactical Opportunities
1%
Cash
2%
Private Income and Tactical Opportunities are retained as source-native categories; AltTrack does not infer their internal strategy mix.
As of June 30, 2025 (modeled history begins December 31, 2006) · Research model
Public equity
48%
Public fixed income
32%
Private equity and secondaries
10%
Private debt and direct lending
9%
Private infrastructure
1%
Private real estate
1%
This is Apollo's own hypothetical whole-portfolio model and stated analysis, not real client holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
As of June 30, 2025 (modeled history begins December 31, 2006) · Research model
Public equity
36%
Public fixed income
24%
Private equity and secondaries
21%
Private debt and direct lending
16%
Private infrastructure
1%
Private real estate
1%
This is Apollo's own hypothetical whole-portfolio model and stated analysis, not real client holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
As of June 30, 2025 (modeled history begins December 31, 2006) · Research model
Public equity
24%
Public fixed income
16%
Private equity and secondaries
32%
Private debt and direct lending
25%
Private infrastructure
2%
Private real estate
2%
This is Apollo's own hypothetical whole-portfolio model and stated analysis, not real client holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
As of June 30, 2025 (modeled history begins December 31, 2006) · Research model
Public equity
12%
Public fixed income
8%
Private equity and secondaries
42%
Private debt and direct lending
32%
Private infrastructure
2%
Private real estate
2%
This is Apollo's own hypothetical whole-portfolio model and stated analysis, not real client holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
As of June 2025 (modeled history begins December 2004) · Research model
Public fixed income
20%
Public equity
20%
Private equity
20%
Private infrastructure
15%
Private real estate
12%
Alternative risk premia
13%
This is Ares's own hypothetical model and stated analysis, not a real institution's holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
As of June 2025 (modeled history begins December 2004) · Research model
Public fixed income
53%
Private credit
22%
Private real estate
14%
Private infrastructure
11%
This is Ares's own hypothetical model and stated analysis, not a real institution's holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
As of June 2025 (modeled history begins December 2004) · Research model
Public fixed income
30%
Public equity
11%
Private equity
15%
Private infrastructure
14%
Private real estate
13%
Private credit
5%
Alternative risk premia
12%
This is Ares's own hypothetical model and stated analysis, not a real institution's holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
As of June 2025 (modeled history begins December 2004) · Research model
Public fixed income
45%
Public equity
4%
Private equity
6%
Private infrastructure
12%
Private real estate
14%
Private credit
14%
Alternative risk premia
5%
This is Ares's own hypothetical model and stated analysis, not a real institution's holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
As of December 31, 2023 (10-year modeled history) · Research model
Equity
45%
Fixed income
25%
Private equity
10%
Private credit
10%
Private real estate
10%
This is Blackstone's own hypothetical whole-portfolio model and stated analysis, not real client holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
Alternative-asset-manager private-wealth research model
As of December 31, 2023 (modeled history begins December 31, 2015) · Research model
Public equity
42%
Fixed income
28%
Private equity
18%
Private credit
6%
Private real estate
6%
This is Blue Owl's own hypothetical whole-portfolio model and stated analysis, not real client holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
Alternative-asset-manager private-wealth research model
As of December 31, 2023 (modeled history begins December 31, 2015) · Research model
Public equity
42%
Fixed income
28%
Private equity
10%
Private credit
10%
Private real estate
10%
This is Blue Owl's own hypothetical whole-portfolio model and stated analysis, not real client holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
Alternative-asset-manager private-wealth research model
As of December 31, 2023 (modeled history begins December 31, 2015) · Research model
Public equity
42%
Fixed income
28%
Private credit
15%
Private real estate
15%
This is Blue Owl's own hypothetical whole-portfolio model and stated analysis, not real client holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
This is an age-cohort average reported by high-net-worth individuals making personal allocation decisions, not institutional holdings, a target allocation, or a recommendation.
This is an age-cohort average reported by high-net-worth individuals making personal allocation decisions, not institutional holdings, a target allocation, or a recommendation.
'Income' is CalPERS' asset-class label and must not be mistaken for portfolio distributions. CalPERS launched a Total Portfolio Approach in July 2026; its former 40% private-markets target is historical and is not shown here.
This is a global average reported by individual high-net-worth respondents, including more than 1,300 ultra-high-net-worth respondents, not an institutional allocation or recommendation.
The company defines alternative investments as including hedge funds, reinsurance, private-equity limited partnerships, and real assets, but does not publish each component's percentage. Those broad categories are not split here.
CPP Investments uses a hybrid implementation model spanning direct investments, co-investments and partners, secondary investments, and fund investments. The displayed actual combined-fund allocation is distinct from its leveraged strategic targets.
Strategic Investments and Active Credit remain source-native categories. Active Credit combines public and private exposures, so AltTrack does not recast it as private credit.
This regional case study covers only 24 China-based family offices, and some visuals may have fewer responses. It is useful as a distinct peer reference, not as a global or North American family-office norm.
This is an average across a global family-office survey, not an individual family office’s holdings, a recommended allocation, or an investable composite.
HOOPP publicly discloses a complete but unusually broad two-category allocation. Capital markets and private markets are preserved exactly and are not subdivided from narrative descriptions.
This is a separately mandated Australian government fund managed by the Future Fund Management Agency, not the main Future Fund portfolio. Its short track record reflects a November 2023 inception.
As of April 30, 2025 (20-year analysis through December 2024) · Research model
Equities
50%
Fixed income
25%
Private equity
15%
Private credit
5%
Hedge fund
5%
This is iCapital's own hypothetical whole-portfolio model and stated analysis, not real client holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
Alternatives ranged from 12.5% for institutions under $50 million to 62.5% for institutions over $5 billion. The all-participant dollar-weighted allocation is not representative of a typical institution or individual investor.
This is Neuberger Berman's own hypothetical committed-capital liquidity-portfolio model and stated analysis, not real client holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
Modeled expected return
6.8%
Capital market assumptions as of November 30, 2021
This is Neuberger Berman's own hypothetical committed-capital liquidity-portfolio model and stated analysis, not real client holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
Modeled expected return
3.78%
Capital market assumptions as of November 30, 2021
This is Neuberger Berman's own hypothetical committed-capital liquidity-portfolio model and stated analysis, not real client holdings, a neutral market fact, an investable portfolio, or a recommendation from AltTrack.
Modeled expected return
1.89%
Capital market assumptions as of November 30, 2021
Credit, absolute return strategies, and opportunistic alternatives
8.8%
The public release combines unlike exposures in two broad source-native categories. AltTrack preserves those labels instead of guessing at an internal split.
Listed equities (3% Emerging Markets, 4% New Zealand, 47% Developed Markets)
54%
Fixed income (3% corporate debt securities, 5% other, 10% Treasury)
18%
Private Equity
5%
Real Estate
5%
Alternatives
8%
Infrastructure
4%
Rural and timber
5%
Other (cash and miscellaneous)
1%
The report provides parenthetical detail within its broad listed-equity and fixed-income categories. Those source-native labels are retained rather than split into reconstructed slices.
The allocation is an average across participating North American family offices, not a recommended portfolio or an investable composite. Individual family-office portfolios vary materially.
The allocation is a policy target dated one day after Stanford published the Merged Pool return through June 30, 2025. The two dates are shown separately and are not represented as same-day actual holdings.
The ACFR return table is dated June 30, 2025 while the allocation is dated August 31, 2025. Both are for the same Pension Trust Fund, but the two-month date difference remains explicit.
As of Q4 2024 (trailing 12 months) · Survey composite
Real Estate
28%
Private Equity
28%
Public Equities
23%
Cash & Cash Equivalent
9%
Fixed Income
7%
Hedge Funds
2%
Miscellaneous
1%
Currencies
1%
Commodities
1%
This is an aggregate of allocation decisions reported by individual high-net-worth TIGER 21 members, not an institutional portfolio, recommended allocation, or investable composite.
As of 2025 strategic allocation · Survey composite
Fixed income — developed markets
14%
Fixed income — emerging markets
3%
Equities — developed markets
27%
Equities — emerging markets
5%
Cash or cash equivalent
9%
Private equity — direct investments
8%
Private equity — funds / funds of funds
9%
Private debt
3%
Hedge funds
6%
Real estate
11%
Infrastructure
1%
Gold
2%
Precious metals excluding gold
0%
Commodities
1%
Art and antiques
1%
This is the reported global average for very large family offices, not an individual investor’s allocation, a recommendation, or an investable composite.
The allocation table is the CTF by-asset-class view. The same report also shows an overlay-adjusted column; AltTrack does not blend the two presentations.
As of FY2020 (published September 2019) · Policy target
Absolute return
23%
Venture capital
21.5%
Leveraged buyouts
16.5%
Foreign equity
13.75%
Real estate
10%
Bonds and cash
7%
Natural resources
5.5%
Domestic equity
2.75%
Yale has not published a comparably detailed current allocation in its recent public return releases. This is a historical target and must not be presented as Yale's current allocation.
This gives you real reference points for how institutional investors, wealth managers, and fund sponsors actually approach combining public markets with private equity, real estate, private credit, and other alternative investments. Seeing the disclosed range — from a sovereign fund with no private equity at all to an endowment allocating more than 40% — offers real context for thinking through your own alternative investment allocation. Sponsor and manager research shows the thinking and construction behind portfolios from firms that individual investors might actually invest through. Peer surveys from investor networks show how other individual and high-net-worth investors allocate in practice, which may be more directly relevant to your own situation than a large institution's holdings.
What do these allocations show?
They show dated allocations and documented returns reported by selected institutions and surveys, plus clearly labeled hypothetical research-firm models. Each entry identifies whether its allocation is an actual holding, policy target, survey composite, or research model, and labels the return according to its source and denominator.
Can I use one of these as my own target allocation?
These figures are shown as reference points, not a recommendation. Research models are hypothetical analyses rather than actual holdings. Institutions differ from individual investors in liquidity needs, tax treatment, time horizon, access to managers, staffing, and governance — all factors that affect what allocation is appropriate for any specific investor. For a closer look at how these considerations apply to individual portfolios, see how much of your portfolio should be in alternative investments.
Why don't the categories match?
Each source defines and reports its own categories. We preserve those labels rather than forcing unlike strategies into a common taxonomy.
Where does the data come from?
The figures come from the institutions' reports, regulatory filings, and the named survey and research publications. Review every citation, transformation, and methodology note on the allocation sources and methodology page.
Allocation figures shown are based on each source's public disclosures, sourced and dated for each entry. Institutional and survey allocations may not reflect current allocations, which can change over time; sponsor and manager models are hypothetical analyses, not actual holdings. None are independently verified by AltTrack. Categories, return methods, and definitions vary by source and are not standardized across entries — figures from different entries should not be treated as measured on the same basis. AltTrack is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to any institution, survey provider, sponsor, or manager referenced on this page. This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation regarding your own portfolio.